Here is an interesting one
Richard Irving
rirving at antient.org
Mon Mar 7 22:27:23 UTC 2005
Richard Irving wrote:
> Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
>
>> --- snmpd.te 2005-03-05 00:13:17.000000000 -0500
>> +++ snmpd.new 2005-03-05 00:13:46.000000000 -0500
>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
<snip>
> 1.17 and 1.19.1 are the only two I can find....
Thank You, Ivan.
I have synced my sources, added the changes, threw
in a few extras for a few other functions I chained in
on snmpd, as a litmus test...
And it runs error, and log entry free.
Once the audit, make, and install, reload.. all works well, this system
is -smooth-. But, I did still have to:
"dontaudit snmpd_t unconfined_t:process signull;"
To keep from getting one of the scripts to not log.
I'll chase that down later, as it is the -only- unconfined_t entry
that was involved, and it was a "signull".
Once again, Thanks.
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
More information about the fedora-selinux-list
mailing list