Here is an interesting one

Richard Irving rirving at antient.org
Mon Mar 7 22:27:23 UTC 2005


Richard Irving wrote:
> Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
> 
>> --- snmpd.te    2005-03-05 00:13:17.000000000 -0500
>> +++ snmpd.new   2005-03-05 00:13:46.000000000 -0500
>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
<snip>
>  1.17 and 1.19.1 are the only two I can find....

   Thank You, Ivan.

   I have synced my sources, added the changes, threw
in a few extras for a few other functions I chained in
on snmpd, as a litmus test...

   And it runs error, and log entry free.

   Once the audit, make, and install, reload.. all works well, this system
is -smooth-. But, I did still have to:

  "dontaudit snmpd_t unconfined_t:process signull;"

To keep from getting one of the scripts to not log.

  I'll chase that down later, as it is the -only- unconfined_t entry
that was involved, and it was a "signull".

   Once again, Thanks.






> -- 
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list




More information about the fedora-selinux-list mailing list