New policy for yam

Daniel J Walsh dwalsh at redhat.com
Thu Mar 17 19:30:31 UTC 2005


David Hampton wrote:

>On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 09:20 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Why did you create a yam_crond_t?  Why not just transition to yam_t from 
>>crond?
>>    
>>
>
>When I first started working on the policy I was trying to be as
>restrictive as possible and differentiate between what peripheral files
>could be opened when running yam from the command line vs. when running
>from cron.  For example, the cron version requires less access to the
>terminal and no access to a ssh file descriptor.  The two instances also
>try reading their dot files from different directories.
>
>I wrote this policy just after writing an exim policy that distinguished
>between user, sysadm, and system invocations of the program.  Perhaps I
>went overboard here.
>
>David
>
>P.S. I'm still tweaking the exim policy.  I'll probably post it in a
>week or so.
>
>
>  
>
I was just question almost doubling of rules and increase in complexity 
for little gain in security.

Dan


-- 





More information about the fedora-selinux-list mailing list