Odd boolean in /etc/selinux/strict/booleans?

Ivan Gyurdiev ivg2 at cornell.edu
Thu Mar 31 15:26:42 UTC 2005

> We could make the setsebool smarter to handle this.  But currently all
> post is doing is looking for an rpmsave file since booleans will now be 
> replaced,
> and renaming it to local iff local did not already exist.

No, it's looking for an rpmorig file, which is why it doesn't work.
Isn't rpmorig created when it wasn't in the rpm database to begin with?

Ivan Gyurdiev <ivg2 at cornell.edu>
Cornell University

More information about the fedora-selinux-list mailing list