selinux and udev ?

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mardi 29 novembre 2005 à 11:48 -0500, Stephen Smalley a écrit :
> On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 08:20 -0800, Tom London wrote:
> > There are reports in fedora-test about the 2.X policy slowing down
> > udev. (Appears that folks are comparing booting with selinxux=1 with
> > selinux=0).
> > 
> > I have to admit that udev is running slower (targeted/enforcing).
> > 
> > Any validity to this?  Known issue? How to track down?
> 
> First, check whether you have any avc denials associated with udev in
> your audit.log.

There are certainly many denials with the new 2.0 policy, including udev
stuff (at least it was the case a week ago). I've posted 2.0 audit logs
many times in bugzilla.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/attachments/20051129/7b81a205/attachment.sig>