SELinux Module Packaging in FC5

[Joshua Brindle]

> From: Paul Howarth [mailto:paul at city-fan.org] 
<snip>

> > Back to the point, my email a few times back suggested 
> putting a line 
> > with just ; where the rules would be in order to get a 
> module without 
> > rules, have you tried that?
> 
> Is this with or without the requires clause?
> 
> With the requires clause, the semicolon doesn't seem to make 
> any difference.

Ok, now I'm not sure what is going on. I built a policy with no rules
and it linked in fine. (no ; was required either).. The policy_module
statement always brings in a ton of requires (object classes mainly) so
you'll always have requires whether you add them explicitly or not.

What problem are you running into with this?