Trusted Solaris over SELinux
Andy Green
andy at warmcat.com
Sat May 20 15:35:32 UTC 2006
Justin Conover wrote:
> http://globalspecials.sun.com/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayPage&Locale=en_US&id=ProductDetailsPage&SiteID=sunstor&productID=36446400&Env=BASE
>
> ...with yer $995 - $27K trusted Solaris junk. Give me Linux+selinux at
> $0 per unit when I am flat on my back... or happy and healthy and paying
> Actually Solaris 10 is intergrating the bits of Trusted Solaris which
> will make it FREE. I'm not saying one is better than the other, simply
> wondering what the SELinux developers thought.
>
> To say that Trusted Solaris is junk seems a bit silly, if your only
> talking of price, ok, but if your talking the OS, than your just
> mis-informed.
I'm talking of the price. I'm sure IBM take their cut for managing it,
but at $995+ /cpu, $0 linux+selinux has to win out here even if Trusted
Solaris poops golden eggs. The benchmark is Windows level of security.
-Andy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4492 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/attachments/20060520/0dfd33b5/attachment.bin>
More information about the fedora-selinux-list
mailing list