Trusted Solaris over SELinux

Andy Green andy at warmcat.com
Sat May 20 15:35:32 UTC 2006


Justin Conover wrote:

>     http://globalspecials.sun.com/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayPage&Locale=en_US&id=ProductDetailsPage&SiteID=sunstor&productID=36446400&Env=BASE
> 
>     ...with yer $995 - $27K trusted Solaris junk.  Give me Linux+selinux at
>     $0 per unit when I am flat on my back... or happy and healthy and paying

> Actually Solaris 10 is intergrating the bits of Trusted Solaris which 
> will make it FREE.  I'm not saying one is better than the other, simply 
> wondering what the SELinux developers thought.
> 
> To say that Trusted Solaris is junk seems a bit silly, if your only 
> talking of price, ok, but if your talking the OS, than your just 
> mis-informed.

I'm talking of the price.  I'm sure IBM take their cut for managing it, 
but at $995+ /cpu, $0 linux+selinux has to win out here even if Trusted 
Solaris poops golden eggs.  The benchmark is Windows level of security.

-Andy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4492 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/attachments/20060520/0dfd33b5/attachment.bin>


More information about the fedora-selinux-list mailing list