adding only port 1186 to mysqld connect
Johnny Tan
linuxweb at gmail.com
Tue Dec 11 19:41:51 UTC 2007
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 17:14 -0500, Johnny Tan wrote:
>> Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>>> Then I tried:
>>>> semanage port -a -t mysqld_port_t -p tcp 1186
>>> What does semanage port -l | grep 1186 show afterward?
>> # semanage port -l | grep 1186
>> mysqld_port_t tcp 1186, 3306
>>
>>
>>> What do you mean by "didn't work", i.e. same avc message repeated
>>> afterward upon subsequent attempts to connect?
>> type=AVC msg=audit(1197324654.830:1482): avc: denied {
>> name_connect } for pid=20484 comm="mysqld" dest=54859
>> scontext=root:system_r:mysqld_t:s0
>> tcontext=system_u:object_r:port_t:s0 tclass=tcp_socket
>> type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1197324654.830:1482): arch=c000003e
>> syscall=42 success=no exit=-13 a0=e a1=1972e194 a2=10
>> a3=4504aedc items=0 ppid=20385 pid=20484 auid=0 uid=27
>> gid=27 euid=27 suid=27 fsuid=27 egid=27 sgid=27 fsgid=27
>> tty=pts1 comm="mysqld" exe="/usr/libexec/mysqld"
>> subj=root:system_r:mysqld_t:s0 key=(null)
>
> Hmm...that's a bug then - that should work, and seems to work for me on
> Fedora 7.
I can file a bugzilla. But do you know if these types of
changes get backported into RHEL? They're technically not
security exploits so I'm guessing "no".
I had previously wrote this... does this fix my issue?
>>>> p.s. Does this patch:
>>>> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2007-November/msg00786.html
>>>>
>>>> ... do what I'm trying to accomplish? I see 1186 is added to
>>>> the mysqld network ports.
>>>>
>>>> But either way, since it's a recent commit against Fedora,
>>>> I'm guessing it will be some time before it gets into
>>>> RHEL-5. Actaully, do these types of SELinux targeted-policy
>>>> commits even get backported into RHEL? It's not really a
>>>> security patch, as such.
Thanks for your help, Stephen.
johnn
More information about the fedora-selinux-list
mailing list