Worrying AVC messages

[Daniel J Walsh]

Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 16:52, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>   
>> There were two different types of avc in your email.  The first
>> concerning postfix should be fixed in the next update.   Getting the
>> /dev/video1 to come up properly is the other.   Something is wrong in
>> the way you are telling udev to create these devices, unfortunately I
>> have no idea, how to fix.
>>
>>     
> /dev/video1 isn't a problem.  There's the usual issue of which order the 
> video*s are allocated, and I tried to create udev rules to handle this.  One 
> works, one doesn't.
>
> This works:
>
> KERNEL=="video*", SYSFS{model}=="Pixart PAC207-BCA", SYMLINK+="webcam"
>
> and /dev/webcam points to the correct /dev/video*, whichever one matches the 
> model.
>
> This doesn't - the /dev/DC10+ never gets created:
>
>  KERNEL=="video*", SUBSYSTEM=="video4linux", SYSFS{name}=="DC10plus_0_", 
> SYSFS{dev}=="81:1", SYMLINK+="DC10plus", GROUP="video"
>
> This is a pci capture card.  The definintions were taken directly from 
> udevinfo.
>
> I've read until my eyes closed, without getting any further with this.  I can 
> live with the situation, but I'd love to have it really working.  I 
> appreciate that you are all very busy people, but as I said before, if I can 
> help, I will.
>
>   
Yes I think  you would be better off asking at the fedora-list rather 
than here.  More people would understand udev there.
> Anne
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list