"HASHTAB_OVERFLOW" undeclared

[Ken YANG]

Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 19:43 +0800, Ken YANG wrote:
>> Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 10:49 +0800, Ken YANG wrote:
>>>> i want to use findcon to find a type "tmpfs_t".
>>>> but in FC, there is setools* package contaning findcon.
>>>> i find that secmds(findcon) is in setools-console subpackage
>>>> why fc has not this subpackage?
>>> That's a question for Dan Walsh (cc'd above) or fedora-selinux-list.
>> ok, i have cc to fedora-selinux-list
>>
>>>> i down a setools-3.1-1.src.rpm from tresys site, and encounter
>>>> a build error:
>>>>
>>>> policy_extend.c: In function 'qpol_policy_build_attrs_from_map':
>>>> policy_extend.c:170: error: 'HASHTAB_OVERFLOW' undeclared (first use in 
>>>> this function)
>>>> policy_extend.c:170: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only 
>>>> once
>>>> policy_extend.c:170: error: for each function it appears in.)
>>>> policy_extend.c: In function 'qpol_policy_fill_attr_holes':
>>>> policy_extend.c:246: error: 'HASHTAB_OVERFLOW' undeclared (first use in 
>>>> this function)
>>>> make[4]: *** [policy_extend.o] Error 1
>>>> make[4]: Leaving directory 
>>>> `/workbench/rpmbuild/BUILD/setools-3.1/libqpol/src'
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i have not find "HASHTAB_OVERFLOW" in selinux trunk, especially in
>>>> libsepol. where is this symbol defined?
>>> Those error codes were replaced by standard ones
>>> (include/sepol/errcodes.h) in the trunk version of libsepol, so you
>>> would need to build setools against the stable branch version of
>>> libsepol until they update setools.
>> thank you.
>>
>> i play some tricks on the setools :-)
>>
>> in the spec file of setools-3.1-3.fc7, i find "findcon" and other cmds
>> had been removed:
>>
>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/bin/findcon
>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/bin/replcon
>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/bin/searchcon
>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/bin/indexcon
>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/share/man/man1/searchcon.1
>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/share/man/man1/indexcon.1
>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/share/man/man1/replcon.1
>> rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/share/man/man1/findcon.1
>> rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_includedir}/libsefs/sqlite
>>
>>
>> so i comment "findcon relative" items, and add corresponding items
>> in "files" list.
>>
>> it seems that this kind of "findcon" works.
>>
>> this is a temporary method, i just want to use findcon to search
>> certain context
> 
> How does it differ from find . -context ...?

actually, i forgot it also can be done by "find" :-))
for my purpose,

find certaindir -context "tmpfs_t"

is same with findcon.

but maybe these commands, such as indexcon, will be useful
for diagnosing problem in another machine, as said by
Christopher j. PeBenito in selinux list

>