setroubleshootd AVC denials???
Daniel J Walsh
dwalsh at redhat.com
Wed May 30 17:10:20 UTC 2007
Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2007-05-29, 21:47 GMT, John Dennis wrote:
>
>> updated bz with instructions on how to check if setroubleshootd
>> is running which is the most plausible explanation for why
>> sealert cannot connect.
>>
>
> Nonsense, of course it is and it was running. sealert has been
> now for the last five minutes trying to get connection to
> setroubleshootd (or wherever, showing ``Server load'' message all
> the time).
>
>
>>> and I have put my audit.log on
>>> http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/tmp/audit.log.bz2
>>>
>> Hmm... I get: 403 Permission denied
>>
>
> That should be fixed and it has been attached to the bug 215722
> as well (although, we should really make from it a new bug; this
> one used to be around selinux problems with postfix -- which are
> not fixed anyway).
>
> Matej
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
>
What platform are you seeing these on.
execmem execstack should not be required for setroubleshoot.
Looks like avahi is trying to communicate with dbus running as
unconfined_execmem_t?
You seem to be running a script from hal called hibernate?
More information about the fedora-selinux-list
mailing list