two new questions (sort of)

Clarkson, Mike R (US SSA) mike.clarkson at baesystems.com
Tue Jan 8 20:53:52 UTC 2008


I've been testing dynamic transitions with a simple test program that
uses setcon to change from one mls level to another, as well as one
domain to another. I wrote a policy for this test program and provided
all the rules necessary to remove all of the avc denials from the audit
log. When I run my program in permissive mode, it works as expected
without adding any avc denial messages to the audit log. But when I
switch to enforcing mode, the setcon call fails. Maybe there are some
dontaudit statements that come with the policy causing this. I'm using
RHEL5.1 with the mls policy.Any ideas as to what may be causing this?

Since the subject of dynamic transitions seems to raise much angst and
gnashing of teeth, I thought I'd ask if there is a better way to solve
the problem that we have? I'm investigating dynamic transitions for the
following purpose. We have services that we run that take a long time to
start up, too long to start them up on demand. We want to have a pool of
them up and running, waiting to be tasked by a server. But we'll be
running an MLS system with many compartments and possible combinations
of compartments so it is not feasible to have services up and running
for all the compartment combinations. The idea is to have a pool of
services initialize at some default level, and then assign them to the
correct level/compartment when tasked. Upon completing a task, a service
would shut down and a new service would be started to replace it, at the
default level. Two domains would be used. A service initialization
domain, and a service running domain. The service initialization domain
would have the capability of dynamic transitions. The service running
domain would not. Therefore, when the service is tasked, it also
dynamically transitions to the correct level and to the service running
domain. From that point on it no longer has the capability of further
dynamic transitions. If there is a better way to solve this problem, I'd
like to know.

Thanks





More information about the fedora-selinux-list mailing list