Contents of fedora-selinux-list Digest, Vol 56, Issue 19

[Antonio Olivares]

--- On Tue, 10/21/08, fedora-selinux-list-request at redhat.com <fedora-selinux-list-request at redhat.com> wrote:

> From: fedora-selinux-list-request at redhat.com <fedora-selinux-list-request at redhat.com>
> Subject: fedora-selinux-list Digest, Vol 56, Issue 19
> To: fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 9:00 AM
> Send fedora-selinux-list mailing list submissions to
> 	fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	fedora-selinux-list-request at redhat.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	fedora-selinux-list-owner at redhat.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-selinux-list

> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:57:08 -0400
> From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: selinux is denying consolekit, hal?, ...,
> To: olivares14031 at yahoo.com
> Cc: fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <48FCC674.9010209 at redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
> These should be filed against the kernel.  These tools
> should not
> suddenly need sys_resource.  I believe this is a kernel
> bug.
I will wait then because we just got a new kernel, and it would be a waste of time and resources to file against a kernel that is no longer there :( I hope that you and others won't get upset, unless the new kernel behaves the same way, then absolutely like absolute value of x |x| :)

Thanks,  
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:31:53 -0500
> From: Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu>
> Subject: Re: selinux is denying consolekit, hal?, ...,
> To: fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <gdimb9$jio$1 at ger.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> Antonio Olivares wrote:
> 
> > Dear fellow selinux experts,
> > 
> > selinux is at it again, this time, setroubleshoot shot
> out the warnings:
> 
> Any 3rd-party software installed?  Say, like a binary
> X/kernel driver? :)

Nope!  Regular nv driver as comes default.  I used to like testing nvidia drivers before, but none anymore as it is a hassle to have to build them everytime a new kernel comes out(yes I have heard of livna,and freshrpms and now rpmfusion), I do not want to go there yet.

Thanks,

Antonio 
> 
> -- Rex
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
> 
> End of fedora-selinux-list Digest, Vol 56, Issue 19
> ***************************************************

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com