Supporting multiple OS releases

[Rob Crittenden]

Eric Paris wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 17:28 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> 
>> RIght I think you would need to build on F9 for support on F11 not the 
>> other way around.  Just like you would do with shared libraries.  You 
>> would not expect an c executable built on F11 to run on F9?
> 
> I think he wants a single code base which can be built on F9 or F11.  I
> might not expect that C to run, but I'd expect the same source could be
> compiled on either.
> 
> We aren't providing enough information for his policy to know which
> interface it should be using, not sure how to solve the problem, but
> obviously Rob want a way to use the new interface if it is there and to
> use the old interface if it is not.....
> 
> -Eric
> 

Yes, this is exactly what I was trying to say.

rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3245 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/attachments/20090630/4caa4b26/attachment.bin>