Why xcdroast and not gcombust?
Jos Vos
jos at xos.nl
Sun Aug 31 20:31:40 UTC 2003
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 03:25:01PM -0500, Steve Bergman wrote:
> I was just wondering why xcdroast gets included as the standard cd
> writer and not gcombust. I always end up frustrated with xcdroast and
> gcombust is quite friendly. Also, it's obvious how to write an existing
> iso image with gcombust and I don't see that xcdroast can even do it.
Yes, xcdroast can do this very easily. Not very happy with then UI too,
but I have that with every *G*UI ;-), so I don't know if it is that bad.
Never looked at gcombust, I'm used to xcdroast and the command-line tools.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list