no ... *really* ... any ETA for updated beta?

[Alan Cox]

> and, normally, that would be the official position.  but i don't think
> it's really an acceptable answer given that an estimated date *was*
> advertised some time back.  if memory serves, i recall something like
> august 18 for an update.

A computer software company missed a deadline. Shock horror 8)

> IMHO, if RH is going to make these promises, they should at least
> try to keep them.  if not, then just go with "when it's ready."
> but please -- let's not waffle back and forth.

The answer is "When its ready", and part of the "its ready" is making
sure we can avoid getting into the same situation again