no ... *really* ... any ETA for updated beta?

[Michael Schwendt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 27 Aug 2003 20:28:11 +0200, Féliciano Matias wrote:

> Check the current http://rhl.redhat.com/ one mouth later :
> - "Red Hat remains excited about the open development process announced
> on Monday. We're currently reworking the content of this site to clarify
> questions people have raised since our announcement. We'll have the site
> restored as soon as possible."
> 
> I can't be happy with this. And more important,
> Debian/Gentoo/Mandrake/... users will not be attracted with this.
> 
> Mailing-list and "wait please" answers are not enough.
> 
> This is my opinion at the present time.
> 
> I am an old redhat user and confident about the future of RHLP. But
> think about other users/contributers.
> 
> PS: Sorry for my poor English.

The alternative doesn't look any better. The web pages alone would not
get the RHL project going, especially not if they are incomplete and
don't answer important questions raised by potential contributors
(e.g. on infrastructure, how, and when). The result would be chaos and
disappointment worse than the current situation. 

- -- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/TRIZ0iMVcrivHFQRAvgIAJ0f0oT9G4Pl5Q66AKeRVraUqfSBZwCfRPeS
1QZ5gFtIiwdRQswrrXKhPX4=
=qhbs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----