no ... *really* ... any ETA for updated beta?

Stephen Smoogen smoogen at lanl.gov
Fri Aug 29 23:49:11 UTC 2003


On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209 wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
>no, mike, we don't "become upset and rant and rave."  we post
>a simple question, asking if there *is* any ETA for the next
>beta.  which is a perfectly reasonable question, particularly
>when a specific release date has already been advertised.
>
>see the difference?
>

The difference is that asking it every day to get an answer of 'not yet, 
we are still working on it.' is annoying and after a while abusive. It 
also gets you added to kill files.

-- 
Stephen John Smoogen            smoogen at lanl.gov
Los Alamos National Labrador  CCN-5 Sched 5/40  PH: 5-8058
Ta-03 SM-261  MailStop P208 DP 17U  Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --





More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list