fc1_x86_64 preview on tyan thunder k8w (S2885ANRF REV .03)
Joshua Baker-LePain
jlb17 at duke.edu
Fri Dec 12 13:01:42 UTC 2003
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 at 4:56pm, Thomas Dodd wrote
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > Thats different. You end up needing some mappings for kernel and user
> > space to be efficient when dealing with user mappings. Whether you can
> > get your .5Gb back depends if the chipset can remap it higher up in memory
> > so that the 3.5-4Gb RAM masked by PCI is remapped at the top of memory.
>
> Know which ones, if any, currently can? AMD, Nvidia, or VIA?
> Why would they release a chip that couldn't?
In my (limited) experience, I've only "lost" significant chunks of memory
on Tyan boards. Here are the results of 'free' on two systems with 4GB of
RAM installed:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3688032 3258792 429240 0 105380 2519000
-/+ buffers/cache: 634412 3053620
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 4012172 3476620 535552 0 67296 2975540
-/+ buffers/cache: 433784 3578388
The first system is dual Athlon MPs on a Tyan S2466. The second is
dual Xeons on a Supermicro P4DPE. For good measure, here's free from a
dual Opteron system with 8GB installed:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 8070688 444488 7626200 0 99488 148820
-/+ buffers/cache: 196180 7874508
That's the Arima/Rioworks HDAMA motherboard. Given my past experiences
with Tyan and AMD chipsets (read: S2460 *shudder*), I specifically
requested that my vendor *not* use the Tyan MB in my Opteron systems.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list