error in release notes

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:26:57PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:
> > My next question would be why is including a second older compiler
> > necessary?  I could understand it for the transition to 2.96, and then
> > to 3.2, but why is it necessary from 3.2.* to 3.3?
> 
> Gcc 3.3 has an improved parser which rejects some borderline bogus
> constructs that gcc 3.2 permitted. The kernel like several other projects
> found it had a few of them. [...]

Does that mean that the kernel for severn has to be build with gcc
3.2.x? I.e. could I develop and build binary kernel modules for
severn's kernel from RH9 tools?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20030723/a092053c/attachment.sig>