Yum, autoupdate (was: Re: Graphical boot isn't so graphical)
Jos Vos
jos at xos.nl
Mon Jul 28 12:00:01 UTC 2003
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 01:42:33PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > OK, my first experiences using the yum rpm for RHL9 on RHL9:
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> yum rpm for RHL9 on RHL9?
> Or did you mean "yum rpm for RHL9 on RHL9.0.93"?
Nope, I really meant RHL9, the final version.
> Weird. I've been using Yum on Shrike without any such problems at
> all. Is it reproducible for you? Based on "sometimes it segfaults",
> it doesn't sound like it is. Bad RAM-chips maybe?
Well, it's one of our test systems that I never have problems with
(and we generate also kernel rpm's on that system ;-)), so this is
not very likely. I can reproduce it pretty easy, in many cases it
seems to segfault (I didn't count, but my guess is in 30 or 40% of
the installs I tested - I did this with one single rpm, b.t.w.).
> > - How can I do special actions, like installing a kernel i.s.o.
> > upgrading it?
>
> Hmm, it installs a new kernel instead of upgrading the old one.
Yeah, in the meantime I did notice this. Anyway, I started a new
thread on the Yum mailing list, with more specific requirements
in this area.
--
-- Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl>
-- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364
-- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list