opteron ?
seth vidal
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Mon Jul 21 22:36:21 UTC 2003
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 18:19, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2003 15:28, James Ralston wrote:
> > It doesn't really make sense to take the effort to put AMD64 support
> > in Cambridge, for two reasons:
> >
> > 1. The Opteron is AMD's server chip, and is thus best paired
> > with RHEL.
>
> Ugh.. sounds like a marketing call on that one. Guess we should strip
> all the server stuff out of RHLP since it's all better suited for RHEL
> anyway...
>
> *grumble*
I know some researchers in physics departments who would be interested
in burning some cycles on a rebuild.
Beowulf-node != server.
-sv
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list