XFS ?

[joe]

Havoc Pennington wrote:

>On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:31:04PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
>  
>
>>Isn't this typically the type of module that would go into the
>>"kernel-unsupported" sub-package? I'd be very happy to be able to run xfs
>>at my own risk, being able to do it easily, and keeping a default Red Hat
>>Linux kernel.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Nothing in RHL is supported really, so it's unclear that
>supported/unsupported is a useful distinction.
>  
>
er - what's all this about up2date and rhn then? seems like support to me.

Joe