Feature Request
Kevin Freeman
kfreem02 at comcast.net
Thu Jul 24 23:45:35 UTC 2003
Ethan Bonick wrote:
>>Jeremy Portzer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>But you have to be realistic about configuration tools. If you are
>>>looking for a vast increase in the number of options, and thus the
>>>complexity, of basic things like filesystems, there will be an
>>>exponential increase in the codebase necessary for configuration
>>>tools. There are only limited resources available. As linuxconf
>>>demonstrated, you have to be REALLY good at writing configuration
>>>tools, or you end up with a big mess.
>>
>>Have you looked at anaconda code? It _already_ contains code to handle
>>the requested filesystems, unless it was recently ripped out. The GUI
>>just hides that fact from the end user.
>>
>
>
> Why bother putting it in if you are going to hide it?
>
Now that is the $6 million question. From past responses I gather that
the reason is that Red Hat utterly despises everything except ext2/3.
And now they have even stopped including kernel modules for the other
filesystems on the install CDs, making the "workaround" even harder.
What once required a simple "linux reiserfs" at the boot prompt now
requires 2 more steps: build a new boot kernel with needed fs modules,
and build a new boot CD containing the newly-built kernel. I wonder how
many users will switch to other distros rather than taking the
opportunity to learn how to build a custom install CD?
... but I'm not bitter ... OK, maybe just a little. :)
Kevin
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list