ntfs
Daniel Huettl
doh at gmx.de
Sat Jul 26 12:13:35 UTC 2003
If you read the comments at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65749
you will see that nobody knows what the legal reasons for not shipping
an ntfs module could be. After all, the code is (i) present in the
kernel source and (ii) objections with regard to "reverse engineering"
either do not apply or should apply in the cases of rdesktop & samba as
well. Not shipping ntfs.o on legal grounds seems inconsistent to me.
Furthermore, saying that NTFS (read!) support does not work or works
only partially or is dangerous is nothing but FUD. It has been working
perfectly well for over a year now.
It seems to be the case that ntfs.o continues to be excluded out of
laziness/force of habit or sheer predjudice.
-- doh
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list