Precedence: junk vs. bulk? Misbehaving RH mailing list?

[Jeremy Portzer]

Eric Wood wrote:
> Some RH mailing lists (including this one) has "Precedence: junk" instead of
> the traditional "Precedence: bulk" in the email headers.  Vacation
> autoresponders will likely reply to such lists since they don't see "bulk".

No, a properly configured vacation autoresponder will only reply if the 
recipient is listed in the "To" or "CC" field explicitly.  Therefore, it 
will not reply to managed mailing lists, ever.  Any other behavior is 
broken.

--Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20031008/b57511ea/attachment.sig>