Install only offers ext2/3?
Gordon Messmer
yinyang at eburg.com
Thu Oct 16 23:59:48 UTC 2003
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Its at your own risk because its not subject to serious testing with things
> like the improvements and 2.5 backport code. Not because reiserfs is
> intrinsically unstable or flawed.
I'd heard some discussions that indicated that ReiserFS doesn't check
for hash collisions in its directories, and that there was a non-zero
probability that a new file would replace an older file even though
their names did not match. It seemed a little incredible. Is that
claim now untrue? Was it ever true?
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list