redhat-config-securitylevel vs redhat-config-firewall?

[Jeremy Portzer]

Tommy McNeely wrote:

> 
> Also, why is it called redhat-config-securitylevel, when all it really
> configures is the firewall.. wouldn't it make more sense to be called
> redhat-config-firewall? isn't that what it used to be called? what other
> security level stuff does it configure? :)
> 

I think the idea is that it only configures very basic options about the 
iptables firewall.  It's only setting up generic firewall levels, rather 
than being a full-fledged firewall configurator.  If you want more 
complex things, you have to update the rules manually, or with another 
application.

--Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20031007/e078d97e/attachment.sig>