getting pine to run under fedora 0.94 -- a couple issues
Chris Ricker
kaboom at gatech.edu
Thu Oct 9 11:32:04 UTC 2003
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> There is an alternative to pine called "cone" which I will be
> investigating for possible inclusion in Fedora Core 2. It is produced by
> the Courier MTA people, and I've heard good things about it, although I
> don't know if it provides all of the functionality that pine does yet or
> not. If it provides the features I need from pine, I'll probably bite my
> tongue some day and make the switch. Having been a pine user for about 9
> years across many operating systems and architectures, it'll be hard to
> let go of pine, even though it is evil... ;o) In some ways, using pine
> feels like wearing Sauron's one true ring... It's hard to shake.
cone is like pine the same way mutt is like pine -- both are similar to
pine, but when you have a decade of pine keystroke usage permanently
engrained into your fingers' memory and pine interface expectations seared
on your retina, they're not similar enough ;-)
later,
chris
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list