lilo vs grub
Pekka Savola
pekkas at netcore.fi
Mon Oct 20 15:40:46 UTC 2003
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Monday 20 October 2003 08:07, Chris Ricker uttered:
> > This is because grub can't be installed to /dev/md?. LILO, in contrast,
> > can.
> >
> > You can work around it by manually installing GRUB to both components in
> > the mirror, but that's lame....
>
> Not really, because I'm sure thats what LILO is doing in it's code. Since the
> device /dev/md0 doesn't exist until after the kernel creates it, there is no
> way that lilo can know about it's physical location. I'm pretty sure that
> lilo just has code to detect a mirror, and then just installs itself on each
> part of the mirror. Last time I checked, Linux software raid didn't mirror
> the boot sector.
That's exactly what *lilo* is doing, but the point was that grub is
forcing the *user* to do it manually, right?
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list