would someone kindly clarify this paragaph,please (RH business model)
Michael Schwendt
ms-nospam-0306 at arcor.de
Mon Oct 27 21:55:35 UTC 2003
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 22:35:01 +0100, Martin Stricker wrote:
> As far as I understand the GPL, you may charge for the software. The GPL
> is about source code, not money.
> You may even deny the redistribution of
> your *binaries* (like RHEL does).
They cannot and do not do that with the GNU GPL'ed (or similarly
"free") portions of their products:
http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhel_us_3.html (Appendix 1 section 1)
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20031027/9b4925c7/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list