apt and severn

[Panu Matilainen]

Quoting Antti <antti at victoria.fi>:

> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:13, Kyle Maxwell wrote:
> > > Hmm, it suggests like 100 rpms. This can't be the correct way. Can
> > > somebody tell me how this apt thing works? I mean are these the
> packages
> > > that up2date users get when they upgrade severn?
> > 
> > Actually, 100 sounds kind of low: when I upgraded from Severn to Raw
> Hide,
> > I got closer to 300 RPMs that needed to be updated, and quite a few have
> > been updated since then (several of those are the same packages, just
> > updated again, but others are new). I can't say for sure that in fact
> > you're getting the same ones, but that doesn't sound out of whack at all.
> Ok, I did dist-upgrade and got this with like every rpm:
> 
> Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives//gnome-spell_1.0.5-2_i386.rpm:
> (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#e418e3aa)
> 
> What is this? checksum is bad I guess? How is this possible? My machine
> is i686 and not i386... should I do something... 

You don't have the Red Hat Beta key (or whatever it's called nowadays) imported.
"rpm --import /usr/share/rhn/BETA-RPM-GPG-KEY" unless the key used to sign the
packages has changed recently.

-- 
    - Panu -