serious redundancy in bugzilla regarding betas

[Stephen Smoogen]

More than likely those entries are there from the past and can not be
removed unless 

a) all things linked to it in the database are gone.
b) a complete rebuild of the database is done without those entries and
changing past entries to something else.

On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 03:50, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> 
> > Before "Severn" and the plans on the RHLP, there had been
> > 
> >   Red Hat Linux
> >   Red Hat Public Beta
> >   Red Hat Raw Hide
> > 
> > and a hidden "Red Hat Linux Beta" for the members of the non-public
> > beta program. This has changed. Now there is only:
> > 
> >   Red Hat Linux
> >   Red Hat Linux Beta
> >   Red Hat Raw Hide
> 
> perhaps i'm misunderstanding, but there is *also* a "Red Hat Public Beta"
> still listed -- i'm looking at it right now.
> 
> or did you mean that there's only *supposed* to be the list you gave?
> in any case, yes, some reorganization seems to be in order.
> 
> rday
> 
> 
> --
> Rhl-beta-list mailing list
> Rhl-beta-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-beta-list
-- 
Stephen John Smoogen		smoogen at lanl.gov
Los Alamos National Labrador  CCN-5 Sched 5/40  PH: 4-0645 (note new #)
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S  Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --