Performance testing (pass 1)
Stephan Schutter
rhl at farorbit.com
Fri Sep 26 19:23:08 UTC 2003
I diabled this feature... for fairness...
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, ByteEnable wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 09:10, Stephan Schutter wrote:
> > I compared Windows XP and RHL 9 on a Dell Laptop (C610)
> >
> > CPU: 1000MHZ
> > RAM: 256MB
> >
> > Software:
> >
> > OS: WinXP RHL 9
> > Open office OpenOffice
> > MS Office 2k MS Office 2k
> >
> >
> > Software startup times:
> > WinXP RHL 9
> > (s) (s)
> > OS bootup 37 70
> > Login 8 21
> > Def Browser 1 7
> > Word 2k 4 6
> > Open Office 10 21
> > Def TextEdit 1 3
> > File Browser 1.5 1.5
> >
> > Timings are average of 5 launches. Word on linux, suprisingly, is snappier
> > than OpenOffice... Open Office is faster on Windows than linux...
> >
> > Soooo.... do I need to ask?
> >
> > 1. If Open Source writes better software; then why is it fatter and
> > slower?
> >
> > 2. Is any one at RHL working on desktop performance?
> >
> > These are some of the sugestione that I may need to answe to when I
> > present this and further data to my managers. Gys... what should I say?
> >
> > One of the original sugestions of why to use Linux is that it could buy
> > you longer life on the old hardware... this does not seem to be the case.
> >
>
> I believe that Microsoft preloads some of the office code during
> login/startup. This same same complaint, "it takes so long to load
> word", was leveled at MS years ago.
>
> Robert Thomas
>
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list