beta 1 laptop install and fix
Lamar Owen
lowen at pari.edu
Fri Sep 26 19:34:07 UTC 2003
On Friday 26 September 2003 13:30, Michael K. Johnson wrote:
> One possibility, especially if you were comparing to an up2date kernel
> from test1 (only a week's worth of changes, basically), would be that
> the scheduler interactivity changes that were just accepted into Linus's
> tree in the 2.6.0-test kernels were backported. (A think-o in that
> backport is what caused the SMP instability and has now been fixed in
> the packages at http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/severn/)
> We at least think we can really notice the difference.
I can notice a perceptable difference in speed on my Sony FXA-49 laptop.
Perceptable usually translates to greater than 10%, IME.
The fonts are different, though. (upgrade from RHL9 to FC0.94) Thinner;
smaller; but not bad. Some of the icons in the panel (KDE) are ugly, though.
Crossover office appears to work OK, too. Which is good, since I am a heavy
Visio 5.0 user (Visio 5 won't even install on WinXP, much less run, but it
runs fine on Crossover office on the new FC0.94).
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list