Cipe?

[Dave Jones]

On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 17:17, Steve Bergman wrote:
> But I disagree that it should be sprung upon them
> with no warning or transition period.)

This has been talked about on the fedora lists a number of times
over the past few months.

> 13. Form the basis of Red Hat's commercially supported operating system
> products.
> 
> (I would call this a suggestion of compatibility.  True, it doesn't
> actually say so in so many words, but it implies it.  So if
> compatibility is not really a goal, this is all the more reason to state
> it clearly as a nonobjective.)
> 
> A corporate mix of RHEL servers and FC desktops seems like a very
> obvious and attractive combo.  So FC's stance on compatibility is likely
> to generate either a lot of joy or a lot of tears, depending. 

As already stated several times today in this thread, RHEL 3 supports IPSEC.

	Dave