Dependency issue with UP2DATE: Was(Re: up2date issue with kernel-2.6.4-1.305)
Brian Bober
netdemonz at yahoo.com
Mon Apr 5 02:52:55 UTC 2004
I'm not sure, but I just removed xemacs, dvgrab, ethereal, etc and no longer
get the dependency errors ^.^
I am getting some annoying messages for a bunch of the packages, though:
"The package [package name] is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue?"
Happened for Canna, ipxutils, and a bunch of others
But hey, it worked. I'll try adding those things back later. :-)
Sponger wrote:
>
> I have that same problem with the exact same dependencies!!!
>
> I have searched up and down in the up2date list and can not find any
> packages concerning those files it is trying to update....
>
> Anyone have any idea
>
> On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 01:16, Brian Bober wrote:
> > Gene C. replied:
> > >
> > > Right now the up2date situation is still in the process of being fixed
> (so I
> > > have been told) but it will likely be at least a couple more days before
> > > everything is fixed. So for now I would recommend running up2date with
> > > "setenforce 0" so that policy stuff does not get in the way. After
> updating,
> > >
> > > you can run "setenforce 1" to turn it back on.
> >
> > Thanks. That worked... Well at least it didn't lock up or anything and
> acted
> > normally.. I did get this message though, which appears to be some
> dependency
> > issue between packages:
> >
> > There was a package dependency problem. The message was:
> >
> > Unresolvable chain of dependencies:
> > dvgrab 1.5-1 requires libdv.so.2
> > ethereal 0.10.2-1.1 requires libpcap.so.0.8.1
> > ethereal-gnome 0.10.2-1.1 requires libpcap.so.0.8.1
> > xemacs 21.4.15-3 requires libRKC.so.1.2
> > xemacs 21.4.15-3 requires libcanna.so.1.2
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 15:32:52 -0700
> From: Sponger <spongers at cbbaz.com>
> Subject: HTT IM Satus windows
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <1081117972.3409.5.camel at localhost.localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Hello all!
>
> I just installed FC2T2 and am happy with the way it is performing
> compared to FC2T1. One thing is bothering me though. Ever since I
> first started it up last night, there are about 4 boxes of what it calls
> "HTT IM Status" open, and when I try and close them, they just pop right
> back up, and even killing them wont work either.
>
> Any ideas??
>
> Thanks all!
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 18:36:29 -0400
> From: Alan Cox <alan at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: Dual boot FC2T2 and WinXP?
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20040404223629.GA27776 at devserv.devel.redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 02:39:33AM +0200, Matias Feliciano wrote:
> > Do not probe for this drive. For example,
> >
> > hdb=noprobe hdb=1166,7,17
> >
> > would disable the probe, but still specify the drive geometry so
> that
> > it would be registered as a valid block device, and hence usable.
> >
>
> Don't do this with hard disks, the probe is essential for any usable ATA
>
> > I don't know if this is useful but hope it's help. Try to set the same
> > values as the BIOS.
>
> Partition with a working system (eg Fedora FC1 install disk), then install
> and don't touch the partitions at all in FC2test2.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 18:38:02 -0400
> From: Alan Cox <alan at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: ASUS P4R800-VM incompatibility
> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
> <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20040404223802.GB27776 at devserv.devel.redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 12:41:37AM +0000, Rio Baan wrote:
> > I recently got an ASUS P4R800-VM board to play with, but it seems that it's
>
> > not linux compatible for now. Sound, VGA chipset, and even ethernet
> > controller went undetected by test2.
>
> The IDE is also unlikely to work properly. ATI have ignored repeated requests
> for documentation of their PCI bridg and IDE logic. You own a winputer Im
> afraid.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 15:53:01 -0700
> From: Raymond Lillard <rlillard at sonic.net>
> Subject: Please turn SELinux off by default (was: Re: Howto turn off
> selinux?)
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <407091CD.4050903 at sonic.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> shrek-m at gmx.de wrote:
> > Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >
> >> On Apr 4, 2004, "Kym Farnik" <kym.farnik at internode.on.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 1. Is there a simple howto for selinux?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Err... How about the release notes, for starters?
> >>
> >
> > eg.
> >
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/test/1.91/i386/os/RELEASE-NOTES-en.html
>
> >
> > --> http://people.redhat.com/kwade/fedora-docs/selinux-faq-en/
>
>
> How about making the SELinux default be OFF.
> Then people can assimilate its new features
> at will rather than being forced to deal with
> it at installation time.
>
> Ray
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 15:54:42 -0700
> From: Raymond Lillard <rlillard at sonic.net>
> Subject: Please turn SELinux off by default (was: Re: Howto turn off
> selinux?)
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <40709232.50008 at sonic.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> shrek-m at gmx.de wrote:
> > Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >
> >> On Apr 4, 2004, "Kym Farnik" <kym.farnik at internode.on.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 1. Is there a simple howto for selinux?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Err... How about the release notes, for starters?
> >>
> >
> > eg.
> >
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/test/1.91/i386/os/RELEASE-NOTES-en.html
>
> >
> > --> http://people.redhat.com/kwade/fedora-docs/selinux-faq-en/
>
>
> How about making the SELinux default be OFF.
> Then people can assimilate its new features
> at will rather than being forced to deal with
> it at installation time.
>
> Ray
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 19:10:30 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3 at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: Please turn SELinux off by default (was: Re: Howto turn
> off selinux?)
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <65043.65.40.71.80.1081120230.squirrel at 65.40.71.80>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
> Raymond Lillard said:
> > How about making the SELinux default be OFF.
> > Then people can assimilate its new features
> > at will rather than being forced to deal with
> > it at installation time.
>
> Considering a) this is a test release and b) this release's specific
> purpose is to test SELinux, that doesn't make sense.
>
> That said, the installer allows you to select what SELinux mode to install
> in.
>
> --
> William Hooper
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:12:37 +0100
> From: "Mr. Adam ALLEN" <adam at dynamicinteraction.co.uk>
> Subject: bugzilla advice (firewall not required / gvim icon missing)
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <1081120357.4178.12.camel at elsol.zwan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I was about to disregard a few minor bugs in FC2 test2. Since I've
> entered the testing a bit late on this one, I want to check.. are bugs
> supposed to be filed under Fedora Core (Product) Version 2?
> (I was initially looking at test2 as the version).
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105865
> Extract: Firewalls is configured when the no firewall was
> selected.
>
> I'm guessing that this bug ought to be re-filed since it's marked as
> Resolved (for test2 of FC1). The last comment seems to be 2003-10-30.
>
>
> Also this bug is for a missing gvim icon.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110033
> Is it best to just add a short comment to the existing bug 110033- filed
> against FC1 and left as NEW, or to assume that it is given lower
> priority and will be fixed eventually (and any comments will just add
> more noise)?
>
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Regards,
> Adam Allen.
>
> adam at dynamicinteraction.co.uk
> pgp http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x553349DB
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url : /archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20040405/64ab63d3/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: 04 Apr 2004 19:35:17 -0400
> From: netopml at newview.com
> Subject: Re: Dependency issue with UP2DATE: Was(Re: up2date issue with
> To: spongers at cbbaz.com (Sponger)
> Cc: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <xlty8pbnwp6.fsf at shookay.newview.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> spongers at cbbaz.com (Sponger) writes:
> > I have that same problem with the exact same dependencies!!!
> >
> > I have searched up and down in the up2date list and can not find any
> > packages concerning those files it is trying to update....
> >
> > Anyone have any idea
>
> Yeah it's not trying to upgrade these packages, it's just telling you it
> can't update libdv, libpcap, libRKC and libcanna because other packages
> depend on them.
>
> (BTW sorry if you get duplicates)
> --
> Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer E-Mail : mathieu at newview.com
> Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately
> explained by stupidity.
> -- Hanlon's Razor --
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>
>
> End of fedora-test-list Digest, Vol 2, Issue 29
> ***********************************************
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list