up2date (was Yum and exactarch=1)

Matias Feliciano feliciano.matias at free.fr
Tue Apr 6 19:50:52 UTC 2004


Le mar 06/04/2004 à 21:24, Michael Stenner a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:11:20PM +0200, Matias Feliciano wrote:
> > Le mar 06/04/2004 à 20:49, Michael Stenner a écrit :
> > > If don't want to use exactarch, then you don't have to.  Yum will
> > > still only use architectures that are appropriate for your system.
> > > It's not like it's going to put a ppc binary on your system :)
> > 
> > I said that up2date have the behavior of "exactarch=1" yum option.
> > 
> > Until now, for me, "exactarch=1" does not permit the installation of an
> > i686 on an i486 system or does not permit arch "upgrade" (i368 -> i686).
> 
> Yes.  It sounds like you want exactarch=0.  So, I suggest you use
> exactarch=0  :)

You missed the point here. There is no "exactarch=0" in up2date. There
is no exactarch option at all in up2date.
Right now, yum with "exactarch=0" do the trick (I'm happy :-)). Not
up2date.

This is not important for me. I'll build my new custom packages without
"--target athlon".

I was "anxious" about a potential bug (yum man page is a little
confusing).





More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list