Spatial Nautilus or windows training

Jim Cornette redhat-jc at insight.rr.com
Wed Apr 7 01:54:00 UTC 2004


André S. wrote:
> Em Ter, 2004-03-30 às 16:22 -0500, Noah Silva [Mailing list] escreveu:
> 
> 
>>I don't think this is due to it being spatial.
>>
>>thanks,
>>   noah silva
> 
> 
> 
> I've tried the spatial and the "classic" modes, spatial appears to be a
> lot faster .
> I'm getting used to spatial really faster than I thought, some times
> it's really better to manipulate files using spatial (almost always :P).
> 
> 

I still detest the spacial mode. The mode seems just like NT4. I opened 
windows on the long trail of open NT windows. I then moved all the open 
windows all over the place, closed them, then went down the trail of 
windows again.
The NT windows opened in the location tha they were relocated to. The 
size was the same as the relocation. I see no difference.

About having to run a registry program to change user preferences. I had 
to disable autorun in XP. I had to regedit and change the entry to 
disable the autorun feature.

If anything valuable comes from the default setup that nautilus has 
adapted is that fixing problems in windows is not like a foreign 
operating system any longer. Nautilus is becoming sort of a windows OS 
emulator for file management.

This is not meant as a flame. It is a plead to get sanity back into 
nautilus, since gmc went away and nautilus is GNOME's file manager.

Jim


-- 
Domestic happiness and faithful friends.





More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list