comments from a late adopter

[Russell Coker]

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:07, geneSmith <gene.smith at sea.siemens.com> wrote:
> Russell Coker wrote, On 4/12/2004 2:46 AM:
> > Generally if you have a recent kernel on the non-SE installation then
> > things should be OK.  I'm not sure how recent it has to be though,
> > certainly a lot more recent than RH 7.2...
>
> I have kept the RH 7.2 updated and am at kernel 2.4.20.  Does that sound
> "recent" enough?

A 2.4.20 kernel from kernel.org is not recent enough.  If it's a 2.4.20 kernel 
from Fedora or RHEL then it might work.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page