Does lam need to be rebuilt? --OK today

Tom Mitchell mitch48 at sbcglobal.net
Sat Apr 17 20:51:20 UTC 2004


On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 01:19:25PM -0700, Tom Mitchell wrote:

> I had to remove lam to update libaio.
> It smells as if lam needs to be rebuilt, ....

just to follow up on this... all is ok now.

 lam-7.0.3-6.4 + libaio-0.3.99-2 == OK


-- 
	T o m  M i t c h e l l 
	/dev/null the ultimate in secure storage.





More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list