x864_64 up2date gone wild.

[Sam Varshavchik]

Gene C. writes:

> Yes but ..
> 
> The practical matter is that you do need repository pointers to both x86_64 
> and i386 respositories in the general case.  Updates for the gcc, glibc, 
> XFree86, etc. packages which include both x86_64 and ix86 packages in the FC1 
> x86_64 distribution will require both sets of repositories.
> 
> Hopefully, FC1 x86_64 final will be coming out shortly and that should fix a 
> lot of this stuff.

Pointing up2date to a copy of the i386 update channel did resolve that 
dependency, but it then complained about an unresolved dependency on 
libgl.so, which I believe is a known issue.

Still, this just feels wrong.  The x86_64 channel should include any 
necessary i386 stuff.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20040217/b939c97f/attachment.sig>