conflicting openssl and openssl-devel, using up2date

Jim Cornette redhat-jc at insight.rr.com
Sun Feb 22 15:12:53 UTC 2004


Fred New wrote:
I hope installing the i386 version didn't mess up the installation then. 
I DL'ed and installed the i386 version, since it didn't do it on it's own.

Thanks for insight into the problem. I am starting to think that up2date 
knows better as to what it should do,

Jim

> The problem is that there is no i686 version of the openssl update.  If you download something, it is probably the i386 version.
> 
> Fred
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-test-list-admin at redhat.com on behalf of Jim Cornette
> Sent: Sun 2/22/2004 12:21 AM
> To: fedora-test-list at redhat.com
> Subject: conflicting openssl and openssl-devel, using up2date
>  
> All of the last batch of updates installed except for openssl and the 
> development package for it.
> 
> Both openssl and openssl-devel show up in the applet. Only openssl-devel 
> shows up in up2date. When you try to install the program, you get the 
> following error in the dialog box of up2date.
> 
> There was a package dependency problem.  The message was:
> 
> Unresolvable chain of dependencies:
> openssl-devel-0.9.7a-30                  requires openssl = 0.9.7a-30
> 
> Please modify your package selections and try again.
> 
> No big deal to only need to manually download the openssl package and 
> development, just a notice of the problem.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 





More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list