Testing test releases: do not update

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, shrek-m at gmx.de wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
> >it's clear that if
> >someone finds a serious bug in samba during testing, it should be patched
> >if possible so the people who *are* testing it can continue.
> >
> >this sort of update is clearly different from, say, upgrading from KDE 
> >3.1.5 to 3.2, for example, which would be proposed just for getting new
> >features.  are you seriously suggesting that you don't recognize the 
> >fundamental difference between upgrading because you want a new package 
> >with newer features, and upgrading to fix a significant bug?
> >  
> >
> 
> http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/
> 
> KDE 3.2
> 23  January    test1 devel freeze

sorry, i just wanted to come up with a hypothetical example and KDE
leaped to mind.

rday