evolution 1.5.1 test packages

[Mike Chambers]

On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 11:16, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 10:37 -0600, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
> > 
> > I've also seen problems with it not exiting when the main window goes
> > away on an exit; I expect a few processes to stick around (1.4 had a
> > couple that always remained running), but I was finding 16-20 "evolution"
> > processes still happily chugging away. (I'd REALLY love "killev" to be
> > included for cases like that...;-)
> 
> Hmmm, haven't seen this one.  Note that evolution --force-shutdown does
> the same thing killev used to.  If you see this, you might want to
> strace/gdb one of the remaining processes and see what it's doing.

I did see the processes still around after an exit or at least a forced
shutdown/segfault.  It wouldn't start up again until I killed the
processes running first.

> > *nod* I can live with the ordering, as long as it's "stable" (ie. doesn't
> > keep changing out from under me each time I hit the IMAP server), but I
> > can't see any rhyme or reason to the ordering either.
> 
> The ordering is alphabetical for me but with INBOX always first.   I
> wonder if it's just using the order given back by the IMAP server.  What
> server are you using it against?

I was doing mine against POP3 so it took the folders from the lower
version and I guess copied them.  But mine were not alphabetical (yes
Inbox was at the top) after Inbox, as they were randomly placed down the
list.

-- 
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY

"It's funny until someone gets hurt...then it's hilarious!"