recent kernels.. and smbfs

Arjan van de Ven arjanv at redhat.com
Sun Jul 11 15:08:56 UTC 2004


On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 16:53, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Are the newest rawhide kernels still defaulted to no smbfs?

even fc2 has smbfs again, although for newer windows servers you still
should use cifs....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20040711/88bc447c/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list