yum broken; headers directory missing
Charles Curley
charlescurley at charlescurley.com
Sun Mar 28 17:45:05 UTC 2004
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 08:44:48AM -0800, Andy Ross wrote:
> Seth Vidal wrote:
> > to be anal - yum is not broken - yum is doing exactly what it should do
> > under the circumstance where the metadata it requires is missing. It's
> > exiting with what I think is a fairly obvious error.
> >
> > I'm being picky, I know, but I'm trying to offset a bunch of bug reports
> > about yum being 'broken' b/c it can't find data that's not there. :)
>
> You're beeing way too picky. :)
No, he is not. Seth is absolutely correct. As he is absolutely
correct, he is not picky in the least.
>
> To expand the elided English in my subject:
>
> Yum [has been] broken [because the] header directory [is] missing
Even with the amended sentence, yum is not broken. The server is
broken. The solution is for the administrator to run yum-arch on it.
>
> Are you OK with that verb tense?
>
> Seriously: "yum" might be your code, but it's also an update system
> most of us rely on to get new stuff from the download servers.
Then a more accurate subject would be in order.
> If the *system* is broken, we should be able to submit bug reports
> against "[the] yum [update system]" without worrying about hurting
> the feelings of individual developers. :)
I am not concerned with Seth's feelings; I'm sure he can take care of
them himself.
I am concerned with the precise use of the English language. Think of
language like a network protocol. If you don't use a network protocol
correctly, you don't communicate. Similarly, if you don't use English
correctly, you don't communicate.
--
Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards
and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email
Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20040328/4ca74e29/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list