gimp from March 18th

[netopml at newview.com]

michal at harddata.com (Michal Jaegermann) writes:
> Hm, apparently rsync is not that reliable (rsync-2.5.7-0.7 in this
> case).  After getting via ftp files with checksums
> 7cb1e0a441fd0a05c2048b1ea62d9925 and c4a5987ed46ab63a472d83fe34644561
> I still do not see "anything to replace" as before.  Something
> possibly was corrupted on the original fetch even if reported sizes
> and timestamps agree.

You could have used the checksum option of rsync.

-- 
Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer              E-Mail : mathieu at newview.com
       Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately
                    explained by stupidity.
                     -- Hanlon's Razor --