2.6.5-1.349 ignores selinux=0

James Morris jmorris at redhat.com
Tue May 4 15:11:26 UTC 2004


On Tue, 4 May 2004, Stephen Smalley wrote:

> Interesting - the CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM option is not set in
> the kernel configuration in the corresponding kernel SRPM, so the
> selinux=0 support is disabled.

I don't know why this is disabled now.  Arjan?



- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris at redhat.com>






More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list