saw this review posted on slashdot of FC2

[King, John (Greg) (LMIT-HOU)]

I was refering to the bug the author mentioned in his review. Just because
something has not been posted on bugzilla does not mean it does not exist.
Users are experiencing it regardless. What it does mean is that the devs
will not be aware of the issue to work on it and as a result it wont get
fixed until they are made aware.

Before posting it as a bug on bugzilla, I was going to start looking into
logs when I got home from work and then see if it was something I did first
(until then I just used yum). 

If others had the same bug (the author and some other posters on slashdot)
then it reads to me like it is not something isolated I did and will need to
be added to bugzilla. 

-Greg 

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-test-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-test-list-bounces at redhat.com]On Behalf Of Jeff Spaleta
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:16 PM
To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
Subject: Re: saw this review posted on slashdot of FC2


On Thu, 20 May 2004 12:58:12 -0500, King, John (Greg) (LMIT-HOU)
<greg.king at lmit.com> wrote:
> 
> Anyhow, just an fyi so far I have had a pretty good run with FC2 although
> the up2date bug and dual boot bug are annoying.

Up2date bug? Its not a bug if its not in bugzilla. If you are going to
call it a bug please cite the approprate bug ticket.  I used up2date
last night right after an fc2 install to get downloads...I had no
problems.

-jef


-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list at redhat.com
To unsubscribe: 
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list