header/RPM mismatch
shrek-m at gmx.de
shrek-m at gmx.de
Sun May 2 00:22:39 UTC 2004
Michael Stenner wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:25:20PM -0400, Fulko.Hew at sita.aero wrote:
>
>
>>If yum is not to replace up2date for updating, then why does it exist?
>>
>>
>Well, I'm not even sure up2date existed when Seth started hacking on
>yum. When up2date came into common use, many people preferred yum
>because it let you use multiple repositories and didn't require you to
>pay to set up your own server. Maybe up2date satisfies this now as
>well. I don't know, but the list goes on and on. I'm sure up2date
>has features that some people really like, as well.
>
i do not know when seth started with yum
but rhn-applet and up2date are doing a good job since a few years for me
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla)
$ rpm -qf `which rhn-needed-packages up2date`
rhn-applet-1.0.6-11
up2date-gnome-2.8.40-3.7.3
on fc1
$ rpm -q up2date yum rhn-applet
up2date-4.1.21-3
yum-2.0.5-1
rhn-applet-2.1.4-3
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.1/en/os/i386/SRPMS/up2date-1.0.1-1.src.rpm
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.2/en/os/i386/SRPMS/up2date-1.13-1.src.rpm
--
shrek-m
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list